Legal Opinion

Kohn v. National Film Corp. of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1922No. Civ. No. 3967PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover a large amount of damages—a sum in excess of $100,000— which he alleged he had suffered by reason of breach of contract committed by the defendant. The contract was set out in full in the complaint. The defendant’s answer denied the material allegations as to plaintiff having been damaged and especially alleged that the entire controversy had, on a date prior to the commencement of the action, been settled by agreement between the parties. At the conclusion of all the evidence the trial judge directed the jury to bring in a verdict in favor of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Diamond v. WeyerhaeuserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Finkle v. TaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Walters v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Parker v. James Granger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Curcic v. Nelson Display Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Weck v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Stonaker v. Big Sisters HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API