Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Weyerhaeuser

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1918No. L. A. No. 4533. Department OnePublishedCited by 45 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the collision of defendant’s automobile with a milk wagon on which plaintiff was riding. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant, and plaintiff appeals from the ensuing judgment.

The sole question raised on the appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant’s driver to warrant the submission of the case to the jury.

The accident occurred at the intersection of North Broadway and Griffin Avenue, in the city of Los Angeles. North Broadway runs east…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Davis v. California Street Cable RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Tower v. Humboldt Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Umsted v. Scofield Engineering Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Finkle v. TaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. County of Alameda v. TieslauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Hill v. PeresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API