Legal Opinion
Curcic v. Nelson Display Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1937No. Civ. 10141PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J., pro tem .
Plaintiff was struck and injured while crossing California Street at Polk by an automobile driven by defendant Brunsen. He brought this action for damages against Brunsen and the other defendants both individually and as a copartnership known as the Nelson Display Co., the company for which Brunsen was working at the time of the accident. The case was tried by the court sitting with a jury. At the conclusion of the trial the court directed a verdict in plaintiff’s favor on all issues except the question of damages, which was left for the jury to decide. It assessed the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Kish v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Ryan v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Burlingham v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- O. B. Hinson, Mrs. O. B. Hinson and Danny Hinson, a Minor, by and Through O. B. Hinson, as Next Friend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.