Legal Opinion

Weck v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1947No. Civ. 15252; Civ. 15253; Civ. 15254; Civ. 15255; Civ. 15256; Civ. 15257; Civ. 15258; Civ. 15259; Civ. 15260PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

The nine actions above entitled were commenced by plaintiffs to recover damages claimed to have been caused to their respective properties by the diversion of storm waters from what they allege to be a natural watercourse or channel known as Eaton’s Canyon Wash. The actions were consolidated for trial. At the conclusion of the evidence the court directed the jury to render verdicts in favor of defendants. Verdicts were returned as ordered and judgments were entered thereon from which plaintiffs have appealed on a joint transcript.

Plaintiffs have also appealed (1) from the orders made after…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Heller v. Fire Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Stone v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API