Legal Opinion
Oral-B Laboratories, Inc. v. Mi-Lor Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 19, 1985No. 85 Civ. 2455 (RWS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Mi-Lor Corporation (“Mi-Lor”) has moved to dismiss this trademark infringement action brought by Oral-B Laboratories (“Oral-B”) on the grounds that venue is improper. In the alternative, MiLor moves, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to transfer the action to the District of Massachusetts. Mi-Lor has also moved to clarify the preliminary injunction entered by this court on April 12, 1985. The motions to dismiss and to transfer are denied, and the motion for clarification is granted as set forth below.
Prior Proceedings
On March 31, 1985 Oral-B filed a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McGowan v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Laufer v. OstrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Simonson v. International BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Johnson Creative Arts, Inc. v. Wool Masters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rolls-Royce Motors, Inc. v. Charles Schmitt & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Schieffelin & Co. v. Jack Co. of Boca, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Business Trends Analysts v. Freedonia Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Oral-B Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Cross v. Mi-Lor Corporation, a Massachusetts Corporation, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Pratt v. RowlandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.