Legal Opinion

Simonson v. International Bank

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1964PublishedCited by 187 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

The primary question presented by this appeal is whether the provisions of the new CPLR (302), effective September 1, 1963, and the principles embodied therein, enlarging the bases for acquiring personal jurisdiction over foreign corporations and nonresident persons, have retroactive application to previously instituted actions.

This action, to recover damages for breach of a joint venture agreement, alleged in the complaint to have been made in New York in 1955, was instituted in the Supreme Court in 1960. The plaintiff is a Connecticut resident who formerly resided in New York, the defendant…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by187 opinions

  1. Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. McGowan v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose MenziesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. First National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Laufer v. OstrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API