Legal Opinion
Pratt v. Rowland
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 28, 1991No. C-89-3367 SAWPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEIGEL, District Judge.
The motions before the Court in this matter concern plaintiff’s request for leave of the Court to file a supplemental complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(d). Plaintiff Elmer “Gerónimo” Pratt, a former leader of the Black Panther Party, filed his original complaint for damages and injunctive relief on September 12, 1989. That complaint alleged constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various prison officials on the basis of their alleged promulgation of false charges regarding plaintiff, such as statements that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- B-S Steel of Kansas, Inc. v. Texas Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Wempe v. Sunrise Medical HHG, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Tatung Co. v. Shu Tze HsuDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- American Freight System, Inc. v. Blymyer Engineers, Inc. (In Re American Freight System, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.