Legal Opinion
Schieffelin & Co. v. Jack Co. of Boca, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 4, 1989No. 89 Civ. 2941 (PKL)PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER & OPINION
LEISURE, District Judge:
Plaintiff Schieffelin & Co. (“Schieffelin”) brings this action for injunctive and monetary relief against defendants The Jack Company of Boca, Inc. (“The Jack Company”) and its president John P. Calderaio, Schieffelin distributes the champagne Dom Perignon and owns a registered trademark of the champagne’s label. Schieffelin alleges that The Jack Company has violated the Federal Trademark Act (the “Lanham Act”), the General Business Law of the State of New York, and New York common law by marketing a popcorn product whose packaging bears a physical…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- 800-Flowers, Inc. v. Intercontinental Florist, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Hernandez v. Graebel Van LinesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Neil Bros. Ltd. v. World Wide Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.