Legal Opinion
Laufer v. Ostrow
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 1982PublishedCited by 225 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Meyer, J.
A New Jersey corporation, the business of which is limited to sales of a product manufactured by a North Carolina company, which employs several sales representatives to solicit and service New York purchasers, and the president of which calls on such purchasers together with the sales representative handling the account, is doing business in New York and is, therefore, subject under *308CPLR 301 to the jurisdiction of New York courts in an action for breach of contract, conversion and an accounting brought by one of the New York sales representatives, notwithstanding…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by225 opinions
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose MenziesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Citigroup Inc. v. City Holding Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.