Legal Opinion
Tracy v. Scherwitzky Gutter Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 1, 2006No. SC 17498PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*267 Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether home convalescent care of a nonmedical nature rendered to a workers’ compensation claimant by a member of the claimant’s family is compensable under the Workers’ Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq. The plaintiff, Gregory Tracy, the administrator of the estate of James Tracy, appeals from the decision of the compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner for the first district (commissioner) that the named defendant, Scherwitzky Gutter Company,1 James…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Perodeau v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Davis v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Besade v. Interstate Security ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Duni v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. CashmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. FowlkesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Deschenes v. Transco, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Pizzuto v. Commissioner of Mental RetardationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.