Legal Opinion
Jim's Auto Body v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 11, 2008No. SC 17758PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether an insurance company that is obligated to pay for the repair of a motor vehicle is a “customer” under General Statutes § 14-63 (b), 1 thereby allowing it to file a complaint with the department of motor vehicles (department) against a motor vehicle repair shop. The plaintiff, Jim’s Auto Body, a sole proprietorship in Southington, appeals 2 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing its administrative appeal from the decision of the defendant, the commissioner of the department, wherein the department concluded that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Union Labor Life Insurance v. PirenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. FERNANDO A.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Goldstar Medical Services, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Board of Selectmen v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Heim v. Zoning Board of Appeals of New CanaanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Hogan v. Department of Children & FamiliesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.