Legal Opinion

Neiss v. Ehlers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 1995No. 92-1832-E-3; CA A83026PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*220DEITS, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendants in this action for breach of contract.1 We reverse.

In May 1989, plaintiff was an optician, working for a large optical concern in Portland. Defendant Kenneth Ehlers is a licensed doctor of optometry. He and his wife, defendant Jill Ehlers, had recently opened an optical business in Ash-land, operating under the name Ashland’s Optical Expressions. On May 12, the parties entered into the following agreement:

“LETTER OF AGREEMENT AND INTENT
“The following letter outlines the initial agreement between Kenneth E. and Jill A. Ehlers…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS v. Amber Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Kiely v. St. GermainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Vigoda v. Denver Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. Schafer v. Fraser Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kloian v. Domino's Pizza, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Brady v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Garwood Packaging, Inc. v. Allen & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Staley v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Ronald Dwight Kunde v. Estate of Arthur D. Bowman and Diane EngelkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API