Eddy v. Stowe
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Winfield Dorn, J. E. Rodgers, R. E. Fitzgerald and Morrison, Dunne & Brobeck for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered after a verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of twelve thousand dollars damages, for personal injuries, alleged to have been sustained by respondent, as the result of a collision between a horse, then being ridden by respondent, and an automobile, being operated by appellant Stowe, an employee of the appellant, Mt. Diablo Scenic Boulevard Company.
Appellants’ main contention is that the evidence submitted in the court below was insufficient to sustain the verdict against them, but, in fact, affirmatively shows to the contrary. Counsel…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McIntyre v. OrnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Marcucci v. VowinckelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- McKinnell v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Ward v. MeredithIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Pasadena Realty Co. v. CluneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Johnson v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Jones v. Express PubLishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Riley v. Berkeley Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hontou v. OrvisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.