Legal Opinion

Pasadena Realty Co. v. Clune

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1917No. Civ. No. 1646PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

This action was brought to recover an amount of money alleged to be owing to the plaintiff by the defendant. After hearing the evidence introduced on behalf of the plaintiff, the trial court, on motion, ordered judgment of nonsuit, which was duly entered. This appeal was then taken from that judgment. The appeal was taken under the alternative method; the typewritten transcript of the judgment-roll and evidence comprising more than two hundred pages.

The appellant in its opening brief, in order to illustrate the argument made, refers to various parts of the record and testimony by reference to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marcucci v. VowinckelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Miller v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Miller v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Wills v. WoolnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. McKinnell v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Barker Brothers v. JoosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Eddy v. StoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. California Savings & Commercial Bank v. CanneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API