Legal Opinion

Jones v. Express PubLishing Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1927No. Docket No. 5981PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit rendered at the close of plaintiff’s case, in an action for libel. The plaintiff claims that the nonsuit was erroneously granted, since she had proved a prima facie case by showing that the published language which charged her with unchastity was libelous per se, and that under such circumstances the law presumes malice and casts the burden on the defendants to show an absence of actual malice. Respondents assert that the evidence shows that the alleged libelous language was privileged, and that the charge therein…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Snively v. Record Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Stevens v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Burke v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Filer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Ray Wong v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Swaffield v. Universal Ecsco Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Smith v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Maidman v. Jewish Publications, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Williams v. the Daily Review, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API