Legal Opinion

Marcucci v. Vowinckel

California Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1913No. S.F. No. 5789PublishedCited by 27 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence, the court below, on motion of defendant, granted a nonsuit, on the ground that the evidence did not tend to show negligence or unskillfulness on the part of the defendant. From the judgment of dismissal thereupon given, the plaintiffs appeal.

The plaintiffs seek to recover damages from defendant for injuries sustained by the plaintiff, Maria, wife of plaintiff, Antonio, from the alleged negligence and want of skill of defendant, as a physician and surgeon, in advising her that a surgical operation upon her was necessary and in the performance of said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. JaccardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Boling v. AltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Lang v. Lilley & Thurston Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Lent v. California Fruit Growers' Ass'n of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Estate of KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Dahlberg v. DahlbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. McKinnell v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. Barker Brothers v. JoosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API