Legal Opinion

Harloe v. Lambie

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1901No. L.A. No. 787PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER,C.

—Action in unlawful detainer. The cause was tried before a jury, and a verdict rendered for plaintiff. Upon this verdict judgment was entered, and defendant Lambie brings this appeal from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

No point is urged against the judgment. No error is claimed as to the instructions of the court to the jury, but certain alleged errors of law are urged, which we will notice in the order set forth in the appellant’s brief. The facts are as follows: On November 1,1897, the plaintiff leased to appellant the real estate described in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henehan v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Burke v. Table Mountain Water Co. & LaforgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Jones v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Kelly v. TeagueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Bebnebo v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rankin v. CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Rottman v. HevenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Continental Oil Co. v. BellMontana Supreme Court · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API