Bebnebo v. Allen
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The lease in question was in writing for the term of •two years ending April 1, 1884, and for an additional term of three years at the option of the tenant.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The lease in question was in writing for the term of •two years ending April 1, 1884, and for an additional term of three years at the option of the tenant. The tenant at the expiration of the original term continued in the possession of the demised property, and on the 19th of April, 1884, the plaintiff served upon him a three -days’ notice to quit for violating a covenant in the lease against subletting. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
— Unlawful detainer, to recover possession of a lot of land in the city of Los Angeles, with damages for the unlawful withholding thereof.
The original term of the lease expired April 1, 1884. Conceding for the purposes of this decision that an additional term of three years from April 1,1884, was created, there was evidence tending to show, and the verdict of the jury includes a finding to the effect, that the lessee sublet the premises in violation of that provision of the lease which declared that the lessee should not “lease or *506underlet, nor permit any other person or persons to occupy or…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Harloe v. LambieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901