Rottman v. Hevener
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is an action upon a promissory note. From a judgment that he take nothing by the action and that defendant recover costs, plaintiff appeals.
On May 31, 1919, at Calexico, for value received, defendant signed and delivered to plaintiff his promissory note, whereby he promised to pay to plaintiff, or order, “one day after date, without grace, ... at International Bank of Calexico, California,” the sum of $2,522.57, with interest at -the rate of ten per cent annum until paid, together with attorney’s fees equal to ten per cent on the amount unpaid plus $20 if suit should be commenced or…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. MowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Hall v. First National Bank of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Henehan v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Dollar v. International Banking Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1910
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Hanrahan-Wilcox Corp. v. Jenison MacHinery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Lovetro v. SteersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.