A & K Plumbing & Mechanical, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SETO, Judge:
This Government contract case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment regarding plaintiff’s claim for equitable adjustment on an appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA). ASBCA denied plaintiff’s claim as being without merit.
For the reasons stated below, the court finds that plaintiff’s claim for an equitable adjustment is based upon a reasonable interpretation that paragraph 7.5 of its contract did not require plaintiff (A & K Plumbing & Mechanical, Inc., hereinafter, “A & K”) to varnish all existing kitchen cabinets. The case is to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Community Heating & Plumbing Company, Inc. v. Admiral Frank B. Kelso, Ii, Acting Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Gordon R. England, Secretary of the Navy v. The Sherman R. Smoot Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- BCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Cherry Hill Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Meridian Engineering Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.