Cherry Hill Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
In this contract case, the court is presented with plaintiff’s motion and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Both parties contend that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The dispute in this case surrounds the interpretation of a contract provision regarding the proper measure of payment for the installation of sound barrier walls along a highway. Plaintiff contends that the plain and ordinary meaning of the contract language controls. Defendant, on the other hand, maintains that a patent…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Arizona ex rel. Arizona Department of Transportation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Thanet Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Blount Brothers Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Nicholson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Central Arizona Water Conservation District v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998
- A-Transport Northwest Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
- Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- XXX Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.