Legal Opinion

Cherry Hill Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 18, 1985No. 180-84CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

In this contract case, the court is presented with plaintiff’s motion and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Both parties contend that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The dispute in this case surrounds the interpretation of a contract provision regarding the proper measure of payment for the installation of sound barrier walls along a highway. Plaintiff contends that the plain and ordinary meaning of the contract language controls. Defendant, on the other hand, maintains that a patent…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Arizona ex rel. Arizona Department of Transportation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  4. Thanet Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Blount Brothers Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Central Arizona Water Conservation District v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998
  3. A-Transport Northwest Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
  4. Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  5. XXX Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API