Legal Opinion

Excise Board v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 28, 1934No. 25364PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Court of Tax Review declaring invalid certain protested tax levies made by the excise board of Stephens county for the fiscal year of 1933-34.

In the lower court the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, a corporation, defendant in error herein, was protestant, and the excise board of Stephens county, plaintiff in error herein, was protestee. The parties will be referred to as protestant and protestee when not otherwise designated.

The first question to be 'decided is: Can a municipality make a levy to remove a portion of an existing sinking…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Epping v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Herndon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Phelps v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. Atoka CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Bell v. CrumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Excise Bd. of Ottawa County v. St. Louis-S. F. R.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Leflore County Ex. Bd. v. St. L.-S. F. Ry.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API