Legal Opinion
Excise Bd. of Ottawa County v. St. Louis-S. F. R.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 28, 1936No. 26973PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.
The St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, by its trustees, filed a protest in the Court of Tax Review against the tax levy made for the general fund of Ottawa county for the fiscal year 1935-36. It was alleged that said levy is excessive to the extent of 0.057 mills, the reasons for this allegation being set out in said first cause of action as follows:
“Petitioners allege that the appropriations include $650 for refund to state for relief paid adult blind, under the purported provisions of chapter 24, article 1, Session Laws 1935; that said act is unconstitutional ánd void in that it is an…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shaw v. GrumbineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Baker v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- State ex rel. McCaffery v. AloeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Herndon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Prothro & Kendall v. OrrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- School Dist. No. 25 v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Pawnee County, Excise Board v. KurnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Bell v. CrumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Kiowa County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Love v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.