Legal Opinion
Bell v. Crum
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 8, 1940No. 29643PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county by plaintiff in error wherein he seeks to have defendant in error, as court clerk of Tulsa county, enjoined from paying any part of the district judges’ salaries out of the court fund of said county, under the provisions of article 8, ch. 20, S. L. 1936-37, title 71, § 251b, Okla. St. Ann. Section 1 of said act provides:
“In each district court judicial district of this state having a population in excess of 200,000, and a city therein having a population in excess of 100,000, according to the federal census of 1930 or according…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Herndon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Jones v. AlexanderTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Milwaukee County v. HalseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Cotham v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Petition of BreidenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Rucker v. TappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Haas v. HollomanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- State Ex Rel. County Court of Cabell County v. BattleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.