State v. Highley
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*461LINDER, J.
This is the third of three cases that we decide today in which we examine whether a police request and verification of identification is a seizure under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution.1 As we will explain, our analysis of this case is largely controlled by our decision today in State v. Backstrand, 354 Or 392, 412-13, 313 P3d 1084 (2013), in which we hold that an officer’s mere request for and verification of identification is not a seizure. Contrary to the Court of Appeals’ resolution of this case, State v. Highley, 219 Or App 100, 110, 180 P3d 1230 (2008), we…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. Arreola-BotelloOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. Reyes-HerreraOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. BenningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.