State v. Radtke
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of State v. Ashbaugh, 349 Or 297, 244 P3d 360 (2010). In our first opinion, we held that a police officer unlawfully stopped defendant if she believed that her freedom had been significantly impaired when, without suspicion that she was involved in criminal activity, the officer asked for and received her name and date of birth, wrote that information in a notebook, asked her if she was carrying anything illegal, and, when she said that she was not, asked for and received consent to search her. Defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. Morfin-EstradaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. RadtkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. SotoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. ZACCONECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.