Legal Opinion

State v. La France

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 7, 2008No. 04CR0086; A129310PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for manufacturing a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992(l)(b) (2003), amended by Or Laws 2005, ch 708, § 39, renumbered as ORS 475.840(l)(b) (2005), possession of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992(4)(b) (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840(3)(b) (2005), and driving while suspended, ORS 811.182. Arguing that “any and all objects, information, statements and observations obtained by and resulting from the stop and subsequent search of the defendant” derived from violations of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution 1 and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. AylesOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. AylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. BenningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API