Denehy v. Stewart
California Court of Appeal
APPE’AL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County. Clarence A. Raker, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiff is a judgment creditor of "John Stewart and brings the action to set aside a deed made by said Stewart and wife to their codefendant, Mary E. Wickliffe, conveying to her certain land described in the complaint. It is alleged in the complaint that, at the time said deed was executed, to wit, December 22,1915, defendant Stewart was wholly insolvent and “the consideration named in said deed was the sum of ten dollars,” and that the land so conveyed was then and is now “reasonably worth the sum of five thousand dollars. ” It is further alleged, on information and belief, that said deed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Feigley v. FeigleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
- Goldner v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- McKee v. Title Insurance Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Gray v. BrunoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hopkins v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Neumeyer v. Crown Funding Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hasenjeager v. VothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Cain v. RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Wasson v. Anglo-Texas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- In re the Estate of SmathersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934