Goldner v. Spencer
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. L. W. Lovey, P. L. Benjamin, and Meredith & Landis, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage on lands in Placer County alleged to have been given by defendant Spencer to plaintiff to secure the payment of a note for twenty-one thousand dollars dated November 15, 1907, payable one year after date, alleged to have been given by said Spencer to plaintiff. Defendant Curran, administrator, etc., was made a party defendant because he had an interest in the mortgaged premises, which interest was alleged to be subject to plaintiff’s mortgage. Defendant Spencer filed an answer admitting all the allegations of the complaint except the allegation as to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Simon v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Roberts v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- McKenty v. Gladwin, Hugg & Co.California Supreme Court · 1858
- Taaffe v. JosephsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by32 opinions
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- In Re Estate of FeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- People v. HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.