Legal Opinion

Gray v. Brunold

California Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1903No. L.A. No. 1158PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action to have declared invalid and void a certain transfer of property by defendant A. Brunold to defendant Rosa Brunold, his wife; for judgment against the said Rosa for the sum of $1,600; and to have a lien declared on a certain lot in the city of Los Angeles to secure the sum of $950, part of said sum of $1,600. The court gave judgment against defendants for the sum of $1,600, and that the plaintiff holds a lien on said lot to secure the payment of $900 thereof, and authorized plaintiff to take all necessary steps to foreclose said lien. Defendants appeal from the judgment and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Vaccaro v. Security BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  3. First Nat. Bank v. GlassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  4. Steele v. BuelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  5. Fitzell v. LeakyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Yager v. YagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bramwell v. RowlandOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. In Re DudleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
  4. Zuniga v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Shiels v. NathanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API