Gravelly Ford Canal Co. v. Pope & Talbot Land Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an appeal from the final judgment of the superior court of Madera County, in .favor of defendant and against plaintiff, and granting a permanent injunction. The parties to the action are the same as in No. 1802, recently decided by this court (ante, p. 556, [178 Pac. , 150]), wherein plaintiff sought to condemn a right of way over defendant’s land under the act of 1911. (Stats. 1911, p. 1407.) In that case the lower court sustained plaintiff’s right to condemn. Upon review we were constrained to reverse the judgment. The purpose for which plaintiff was organized and the necessity for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stoner v. ZuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Broads v. Mead and CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Miller and Lux v. Kern County Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Davis v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cooke v. RamponiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Smith v. Royal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Rouse v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Belmont County Water Dist. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Richardson v. FrancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.