Legal Opinion

Smith v. Royal Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1940No. 9202PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

The suit is on a valued policy of fire insurance upon a leasehold interest of appellant in property located in Belvedere, California. The case was here on two prior occasions. 77 F.2d 157; 93 F.2d 143. On the first appeal a judgment in favor of appellant was reversed on the ground that a stipulation contained in a deed from the Belvedere Land Company to the Town of Belvedere, solely relied on in the complaint, did not of itself dis close an insurable interest in appellant. On the second appeal a judgment in favor of the insurance company, entered on demurrer to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Berry v. American Central Insurance Co. of St. LouisNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Morrill v. Mackman.Michigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Harvey Coal & Coke Co. v. DillonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. In Re BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
  2. William Henry Hanson v. Ralph Stanley Waller, Lvl Inc., National Car Rental System Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Belle Fourche Pipeline Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. United States v. Richfield Oil Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1951
  5. United States v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API