Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1879PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Error to Bay. Trespass on the case. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCoolev, J.

This suit is instituted to recover damages for consequential injury suffered by plaintiff as proprietor of lots three, four and five in block thirty of Bay City, in consequence of the keeping up of a bridge by the defendant across the Saginaw river. The plain» tiff’s lots have a front on the river a little below Third street, and they have warehouses upon them with wharf in front, at which the large steamers and other vessels navigating the great lakes and their connecting waters have been accustomed to land and receive passengers and freight. The width of the river at this point is about a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lorman v. BensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Clark v. Mayor, Aldermen, and Common Council of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Prince v. CaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
  4. Thomson v. Mayor of BoonvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  5. City of Oakland v. CarpentierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State Bank of Standish v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Stoner v. ZuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Curtis v. La Grande Hydraulic Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. An-Ti Chai v. Michigan Technological UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API