Legal Opinion

Davis v. Martin

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1910No. Sac. No. 1724PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The controversy in this action involves the respective rights of the parties to the use of the waters of a. stream known as Martin Creek, which» rises in the eastern. part of the lands of the defendants, Ann Martin and Brice M. Martin, known as the Martin Ranch, and flows westerly through said ranch to the Little Shasta River, having a maximum flow, during the irrigating season, of three hundred miner’s inches measured under a four-inch pressure.

The plaintiff H. L. Davis is the owner of a tract of land containing something over seven hundred acres, situated about a mile south of the Martin…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stoner v. ZuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fall River Valley Irrigation District v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Conaway v. ToogoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Gravelly Ford Canal Co. v. Pope & Talbot Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Hall v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Crawford v. InglinIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API