McSherry v. Pennsylvania Consolidated Gold Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco denying a change of venue, and from an order refusing to dissolve an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.
The record in this case contains two appeals, — one from an order denying defendants’ motion for a change of place of trial, the other from an order denying defendants’ motion to dissolve an injunction. The action was for an accounting, and for the recovery of certain shares of the capital stock of the defendant corporation, alleged to have been illegally sold for delinquent assessments to the said corporation, who thereafter declared a stock dividend and distributed thirty per cent of plaintiff’s stock to its stockholders, the individual defendants herein, who, it is alleged, fraudulently…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cohn v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Heald v. HendyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Rey v. BarclayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Spring Valley Water Works v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People ex rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. LarueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Eddy v. HoughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Pascoe v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- McKenzie v. BarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.