Legal Opinion

Spring Valley Water Works v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1881No. 7,629PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Application for writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

McKee, J.:. The Spring Valley Water Company was organized June 19, 1858, under an Act of the Legislature passed April 22, 1858. (Stat. 1858, p. 218.)

Object of its incorporation was, according to its certificate of incorporation, "to introduce into the City and County of San Francisco pure fresh water, for the purpose of furnishing it to the city and its inhabitants; and, in connection therewith, to transact all such business as might be necessary, proper and consistent with the laws and Constitution of the State of California.”

In January, 1878—nearly twenty years after its incorporation— it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Pennsylvania College CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. People ex rel. Dickenson v. BanvardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McSherry v. Pennsylvania Consolidated Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Coombes v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. City of Leavenworth v. Leavenworth City & Fort Leavenworth Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. San Joaquin & King's River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Stanislaus CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898
  5. Catlin Insurance Company, Inc. v. DankoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API