Rey v. Barclay
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco granting a change of venue. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This action was commenced in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco *200to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff by reason of the negligence of defendants, as attorneys at law, while retained and employed by the plaintiff; and the appeal is from an order granting the motion of defendants to change the place of trial to the county of Los Angeles.
On the fourth day of June, 1889, the defendants filed a general demurrer to the complaint, and a notice of motion to change the place of trial, with a demand in writing that the trial be had in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nickerson v. California Raisin Co.California Supreme Court · 1882
- People ex rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. LarueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Rowland v. CoyneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Burnham v. HaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by21 opinions
- McSherry v. Pennsylvania Consolidated Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- O'Hanion v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
- Nanny v. Ruby Lighting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Pittman v. CarstenbrookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Lundy v. LettunichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.