Legal Opinion

Heald v. Hendy

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1884No. 9,514PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from certain orders of the Superior Court of El Dorado County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

The action was brought in the Superior Court of El Dorado County. Defendant demurred to the complaint, and at the time he appeared and demurred (Code Civ. Proc. § 396), demanded in writing that the trial be had in San Francisco, the proper county. Upon due notice defendant moved for a change of the place of trial upon affidavit that, at the commencement of the action and afterwards, he resided in the city and county of San Francisco, and no affidavit denying the statements of defendant’s affidavit was filed on the part of plaintiff. When, on the 27th of October, 1883, defendant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. PendergastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. McClung v. WattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Pascoe v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. McSherry v. Pennsylvania Consolidated Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API