Norton v. Newerf
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Biverside County. Hugh H. Craig, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
In a suit to set aside a former decree of foreclosure of a mortgage of real property, claimed by the plaintiff to have been ineffectual for want of a necessary party, at the opening of the trial the suit was dismissed as to all fictitious defendants and the defaults of all named defendants, other than N. C. Newerf and Mrs. A. J. Bolster, were entered. They appeal on the judgment-roll alone from the decree in favor of the plaintiff. The appellants joined in a formal answer and subsequently N. C. Newerf filed an amended answer by which he joined issue on most of the allegations of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brackett v. BanegasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Hoover v. LesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- E. W. McLellan Co. v. E. San Mateo Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Gerig v. LovelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Ludwig v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by17 opinions
- Whitney v. RedfernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Winn v. TorrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- U.S. Bank v. HurseyWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Williams v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Mickelson v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.