E. W. McLellan Co. v. E. San Mateo Land Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. S. J. Hankins, J. S. Reid, and Rufus H. Kimball, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The action was brought by plaintiff, as assignee of E. W. McLellan, against East San Mateo Land Company, a corporation, to recover $10,727.19, alleged to be due on an account stated. The complaint was in two counts, the first alleging in paragraph III that an account had been stated between McLellan and the Land Company at the city and county of San Francisco, the second alleging, likewise in its paragraph numbered III, that the account had been stated at the county of San Mateo. The defendant answered, denying the stating of any account. The cause was tried without a jury, and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Coffee v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hendy v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Kearney v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Norton v. NewerfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Koshaba v. KoshabaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Holmes v. PottsMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Mardesich v. C. J. Hendry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.