Brackett v. Banegas
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. Plaintiff had a decree. Defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The prominent facts are as follows:
On the 5th of January, 1891, plaintiff brought an action in the superior court in and for the county of San Diego, to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendant, Manuel Banegas, to secure the payment of a prom*282issory note made by him, the said Banegas, for seventeen hundred dollars.
Before bringing such action, plaintiff, as was the general practice, applied to an abstract company for a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Curtis v. GoodingIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Pearce v. BuellOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Baker v. O'RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Revalk v. KraemerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Hallett v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Smith v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Monese v. StruveOregon Supreme Court · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.