Legal Opinion
Hoover v. Lester
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1911No. Civ. No. 952PublishedCited by 13 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
The appeal in this case is taken by defendant from the judgment, and is presented on the judgment-roll alone.
Plaintiff sued to recover a balance of $317.01, alleged to be due and unpaid on account of the purchase price of a crop of lemons. The judgment was for the amount prayed for. After trial, the court made and filed its findings of fact and conclusions of law. Thereafter the clerk entered judgment in the following form:
“Now, on this 25th day of August, 1910, upon and in accordance with the findings of facts and conclusions of law heretofore made and filed by the court in .the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Riverside Water Co. v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- City and County of San Francisco v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Merrill v. Pacific Transfer Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- First National Bank v. DusyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Prothero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Brice v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Easterly v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.