Ludwig v. Murphy
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County. Peter J. Shields, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff. The appeal is on the judgment-roll, and there is no bill of exceptions. The case briefly stated is this: The. plaintiff is the mortgagee, and the defendant Mrs. E. M. Murphy is the mortgagor in a mortgage of date March 13, 1897, given to secure a promissory note of even date for the sum of $1,378, payable April 25, 1899. The mortgage was intended by the parties to include an adjoining strip of land, which was omitted by mistake in the drawing of the instrument. The other defendant is the husband of the mortgagor. The land mortgaged, including the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brackett v. BanegasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Norton v. NewerfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Winn v. TorrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- McKinnon v. BradleyOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Mickelson v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.