Legal Opinion
Cobell v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 17, 2002No. Civ.A. No. 96-1285(RCL)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion to Renew Plaintiffs’ Motion For Order To Show Cause Why Defendants and Their Employees and Counsel Should Not Be Held in Contempt And For Sanctions For Violating The Anti-Retaliation Order (August 15, 2000), filed on May 9, 2002. Upon consideration of the memoranda filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the record in this case, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the motion should be GRANTED. The Court will order Gale Norton, Secretary of the Interior, and Neal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, Aero & Naval SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. National Aeronautics & Space AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Bryson v. GereDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Bynum v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.