Pigg v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted on a plea of guilty of robbery by assault; punishment was assessed by the jury at twenty-eight (28) years.
The case presents fundamental error which must be considered in the interest of justice. See Art. 40.09, § 13, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.
The record reflects that upon learning of the appellant’s desire to plead guilty to the charge the court admonished the appellant in the following manner:
“THE COURT: You understand if you plead guilty and persist in pleading guilty this jury upon proper evidence would have to find you guilty ?
“MR. PIGG: Yes,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Prudhomme v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- McNeal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Ex Parte HarveyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
3Cited by9 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Cevilla v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Guster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Guster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Pinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.