Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Harvey

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1973No. 47033PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This is a post conviction habeas corpus proceeding brought under the provisions of Article 11.07, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

The petitioner contends that the trial court, in accepting his pleas of guilty in the seven causes before the court, did not properly admonish him pursuant to Article 26.13, V.A.C.C.P.

On April 10, 1973, the Honorable John Mead, Judge of Criminal District Court No. 4 of Dallas County, after hearing petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court, entered findings of fact and conclusions of law wherein he found:

“Petitioner’s allegation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BattenfieldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Ex Parte ChavezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Pigg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Bosworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Bosworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API