Legal Opinion · Dissent

Guster v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 30, 1975No. 49538, 49539Published

1DissentOnion, Presiding Judge

Article 26.13, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., provides :

“If the defendant pleads guilty, or enters a plea of nolo contendere, he shall be admonished by the court of the consequences; and neither of such pleas shall be received unless it plainly appears that he is mentally competent, and is uninfluenced by any consideration of fear, or by any persuasion, or delusive hope of pardon, prompting him to confess his guilt.”

In his only contention on direct appeal appellant complains that the trial court erred in not complying with the statute by inquiring whether his guilty pleas were prompted by any…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Espinosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Ex Parte ChavezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API