McNeal v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Commissioner.
The conviction is for robbery; the punishment, fifty years imprisonment.
Complaint is made of the court’s refusal to suppress the witness Mary Moore’s in-court identification of the appellant. He contends her identification of him was tainted by viewing photographic exhibits prior to trial.
At the trial Mrs. Moore identified the appellant as the man who came into the Holiday Cleaners where she was employed and robbed her. He first came into the cleaning establishment asking for clothes under a name other than McNeal. She was unable to locate the clothing. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sensabaugh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Blassingame v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Mistrot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Dunlap v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Pulido v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Pigg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Trusley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.