Williams v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
Appellant waived trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty before the court for the offense of felony theft. Punishment was assessed at five years.
Court-appointed counsel on appeal has filed a brief stating that he has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. A copy of the brief was furnished appellant. No pro se brief has been filed. The procedures in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, and Gainous v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 436 S.W.2d 137, were complied with. We agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.
We have noticed,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Alvarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Heathcock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In the Matter of C.O.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Guster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Murray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.