Prudhomme v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
These are appeals from three convictions for the sale of marihuana. The punishment in each case was assessed at five years.
In Cause No. 27,766 in the trial court, the-plea was not guilty and the punishment was assessed by the jury. In Causes Nos. 27,759 and 27,782, the pleas were guilty and the court assessed the punishment in each case at five years. All the sentences were to run concurrently.
We have concluded that the convictions upon the pleas of guilty cannot stand because certain provisions of Article 26.13, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., and the decision of the Supreme Court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Espinosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Sutton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Flowers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Guster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Session v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
- Kennard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.